Solutions / 01 / Evaluation brief
AI applied to one workflow you can define, measure, and review.
VantaCore AI approaches AI productivity by starting from a single, named workflow — who performs it, what it reads, and how its output is checked — rather than from a general assistant. The point of an evaluation is to establish whether the workflow is a good fit, what a human review step should look like, and how you would measure the result honestly.
Availability
Who it is for / Reader lens
How could AI improve a specific employee workflow without creating unreviewed risk?
Technology and operations decision-makers responsible for a defined employee workflow — a team lead or function owner who can name the task, its inputs, and the person accountable for the output.
Solutions / Proposed evaluation
What it would examine
These are design principles and questions to resolve, not delivered controls or confirmed support.
One workflow
Scope one workflow at a time, not a general-purpose assistant
Knowledge sources
Ground answers in your own knowledge sources, not a public index
Permission boundaries
Respect existing permissions — the system sees only what the user may
Design approach
- Keep a human review step where the output carries consequence
- Define how quality is measured before any rollout decision
Scope to confirm
- Which workflow and which users are in scope
- Which knowledge sources the workflow may read from
- How access and permissions are enforced against those sources
- Where a human review or approval step sits
- How output quality is evaluated and by whom
Before work begins
What needs to be in place.
A discussion needs a specific context and named owners, not an assumed deployment.
Inputs to bring
- A named workflow with an accountable owner
- Access to representative examples the workflow already produces
- Agreement on which knowledge sources are in and out of scope
- A reviewer for the evaluation read-out
The discussion
How an engagement would start
An evaluation begins with a scoping discussion, not a commitment. The output of that discussion is a shared understanding of the workflow, the inputs, the review step, and how success would be measured — inputs to a decision, not a signed deliverable.
How we distinguish claimsBring the specific question.
Share the workflow or constraints at a high level. This is a scoping discussion, not a commitment or an available product.